Comparing Trump and Harris' Child Tax Credit Plans

Child Tax Credit remains a vital financial support system for American families. With the 2024 elections approaching, both former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris have put forward contrasting plans for this credit. Although they both support the concept, their approaches reveal significant differences. Knowing the pros and cons of each plan can greatly impact your family's financial planning. Let's delve into the specifics.

Donald Trump's Child Tax Credit Plan

Trump's plan for the Child Tax Credit focuses on benefiting working families by offering enhanced financial aid and stimulating economic growth. Key features of his plan include:

• Increasing the Credit Amount: Trump proposes increasing the child tax credit amount to provide more immediate relief to families. His goal is to enhance the current $2,000 per child credit to $2,500.
• Eligibility: Expanding eligibility criteria is an essential component. By increasing the income thresholds, more middle-income families would qualify for the full credit amount.
• Temporary Enhancements: Proposed temporary credit enhancements primarily aimed at alleviating the economic impact of COVID-19.
• Refundable Portion: The plan also seeks to increase the refundable portion of the credit, ensuring low-income families receive more substantial benefits.

Kamala Harris' Child Tax Credit Plan

Vice President Kamala Harris' plan offers a more progressive approach, aimed at creating long-term stability for low-income families. Key features of her plan include:

• Significant Increase in Credit: Harris proposes a more substantial increase, up to $3,600 per child under 6, and $3,000 per child aged 6-17.
• Monthly Payments: To create more consistent financial support, her plan includes monthly payments instead of a single annual lump sum. This method aims to help families budget better throughout the year.
• Extending the Age Limit: By increasing the age limit for eligible children, more families with older children will benefit from the credit.
• Permanent Changes: Unlike temporary fixes, Harris' proposals are designed to be permanent, providing consistent support beyond the immediate economic crisis.
• Fully Refundable: Making the credit fully refundable ensures that the lowest earners benefit the most, addressing poverty more effectively.

Which Plan is Better for Your Family?

Determining the better plan largely depends on your family's specific needs and financial circumstances:

• If your priority is immediate financial relief and you're interested in substantial short-term benefits, Trump's plan may be more suited to your needs, especially given the focus on temporary enhancements and increased refundable portions.
• If you're looking for long-term financial stability and prefer predictable monthly payments, Harris' plan offers more consistent and progressive support. The higher credit amounts and permanent changes can provide substantial aid over a more extended period.
• For families with lower incomes, Harris' plan is more advantageous due to the fully refundable nature of the credits, ensuring you receive the most benefit irrespective of your tax liability.

Final Thoughts

Both plans offer distinct advantages and cater to different family needs. Trump's approach is more focused on middle-income earners and immediate relief, while Harris' plan aims to provide sustainable support to low-income families with more progressive measures. Carefully evaluate which plan aligns with your family's financial goals and long-term stability.

Want to save more on your taxes? Set up a call with our team. You can also click the button below to learn more about our services and how we can help you maximize your tax savings.

Learn More About Us